A single, well-crafted prompt can transform any chatbot into a reliable AI news writer, and this one does it with newsroom precision. By assigning a veteran journalist’s role, anchoring content to a specific source link, demanding original paraphrasing, and enforcing a human-readable structure, it acts as an editorial blueprint—guiding research, narrative flow, and ethical sourcing from start to finish.
At its heart, the prompt emphasizes three pillars: a conversational yet authoritative voice, source-driven accuracy to curb fabrications, and a clear outline with headline, lede, subheadings, and conclusion for scan-friendly depth. This ensures articles feel professional, engaging, and trustworthy, without robotic fluff or plagiarism risks.
In this piece, we’ll break down its features, explain why it excels for AI news blogging, and share tips to customize it for stories like model launches or policy updates. If scaling quality coverage is the goal, this prompt is your shortcut.
What the prompt asks for
- A seasoned persona: It tells the chatbot to “act as a seasoned journalist from a reputable publication like Wired or The Verge, with over 10 years of experience.” That one line sets the voice, expectations, and rigor. The bot is no longer a general assistant; it’s operating with a journalist’s instincts: verify, contextualize, and write cleanly.
- Source-first reporting: The prompt hinges on a single link—“Fetch and analyze the key details from this link: [LINK].” This creates a factual spine, reducing speculation and keeping the story anchored in verifiable details.
- Originality by design: “Don’t copy any text verbatim—paraphrase everything in your own words.” That not only avoids plagiarism but forces the model to process, summarize, and synthesize—skills that improve clarity and trust.
- Clear editorial target: It specifies 800–1200 words. That range is long enough for depth yet short enough to maintain pace. The result: fewer meandering drafts and more purposeful storytelling.
How it shapes professional voice
- Conversational yet authoritative: The prompt asks for a human, newsroom tone—short, punchy sentences mixed with longer ones, smooth transitions, and active voice. This rhythm is what makes a piece feel reported rather than generated.
- Readability guardrails: It explicitly calls for short paragraphs (3–5 sentences) and an approximate grade-8 reading level. That’s where clarity lives—clean lines, minimal jargon, and approachable explanations.
- Storycraft without fluff: It encourages “subtle storytelling elements” like real-world examples or analogies, used to clarify—not to sensationalize. The story stays grounded while remaining engaging.
Structure that mirrors top tech publications
- Compelling headline: Informative, intriguing, never clickbait. Headlines should signal the news and the stake, not bait a curiosity gap.
- Strong lede: A tight opening that tells readers what happened and why it matters. This is the contract with the audience: clear value, right away.
- Organized body with 3–5 subheads: These sections cover background, key developments, implications, quotes, and outlook. Subheads improve scanability and help the writer stay on track.
- Ethical quotes: If a source lacks quotes, the prompt allows paraphrased expert perspectives with careful attribution (e.g., “industry analysts say”). It explicitly forbids fabricating facts—a critical line.
- Clean landing: A concise conclusion that ties the news to broader AI trends and leaves a resonant takeaway.
Why this prompt works
- It compresses newsroom best practices into a single instruction set. Role, source, originality, structure, and style—each piece narrows the model’s behavior toward professional outcomes.
- It reduces hallucinations and duplication by grounding the draft in one link and barring copy-paste. That keeps the piece accurate and distinct.
- It’s production-friendly: The structure yields consistent, editable drafts that fit publication templates and can be scheduled with minimal polish.
Built-in SEO without keyword stuffing
- Natural keyword integration: The prompt encourages adding relevant terms in context (e.g., AI advancements, model updates, safety, regulation) without overloading the copy.
- User value first: It emphasizes answering “why this matters,” which is what search engines and readers reward—clarity, depth, and usefulness.
- Trust and transparency: It suggests citing the source implicitly (“According to recent reports from [source name]”) and discourages manipulative tactics—hallmarks of trustworthy content.
What to watch out for—and how the prompt prevents it
- Plagiarism: The “no verbatim copying” rule, plus paraphrasing, stops duplication and improves synthesis. It also prompts clearer, more readable prose.
- Overconfident claims: The source-first instruction and ethical attribution reduce fabricated or unsupported statements.
- Robotic voice: Varying sentence lengths, active voice, and short paragraphs yield a human cadence. The explicit readability target prevents jargon creep.
Copy-ready version of the prompt
Act as a seasoned journalist from a reputable publication like Wired or The Verge, with over 10 years of experience covering AI and technology news. I want you to write an original, engaging news article based on the information from this link: [LINK]. Fetch and analyze the key details from that page, then craft a fresh piece that doesn’t copy any text verbatim—paraphrase everything in your own words, add insightful context where it makes sense (drawing from general tech knowledge but sticking to facts), and ensure it’s 800-1200 words for depth.
Make the article look and feel like it’s written by a human professional: Use a conversational yet authoritative tone, vary sentence lengths for rhythm (mix short punchy sentences with longer explanatory ones), incorporate active voice, smooth transitions, and subtle storytelling elements like real-world examples or analogies to make it relatable. Avoid repetitive phrases, jargon overload, or anything that sounds robotic—keep it easy to read with simple language, short paragraphs (3-5 sentences max), and a Flesch-Kincaid readability score around grade 8.
Structure it like a high-quality publication piece:
Start with a compelling headline that’s informative and intriguing (no clickbait).
Follow with a strong lede paragraph that hooks the reader and summarizes the main news.
Use 3-5 subheadings to organize the body, covering background, key developments, implications, expert quotes (paraphrased or invented realistically if none are in the source, but attribute them ethically), and future outlook.
End with a concise conclusion that ties it back to broader AI trends and leaves the reader with a thoughtful takeaway.
Weave in natural SEO elements: Include relevant keywords organically (e.g., if the topic is AI advancements, use them in context without stuffing), focus on user value like answering ‘why this matters,’ and ensure it’s helpful and trustworthy.
To align with Google’s policies, make it 100% original—do not plagiarize, fabricate facts, or use manipulative tactics. Base everything on the link’s content, cite the source implicitly in the text (e.g., ‘According to recent reports from [source name]’), emphasize expertise by explaining concepts clearly, and prioritize accuracy and balance (mention pros, cons, or counterpoints if relevant).
If the link focuses on [SPECIFIC ANGLE OR FOCUS], emphasize that; otherwise, highlight the most newsworthy AI-related aspects. Finally, proofread for a polished, error-free result that reads like it was edited by a newsroom team. You can use other resources/links from the web to add more insights into the article to make it more useful for readers
Final takeaway
This prompt is a compact editorial system. It defines the role, constrains the facts, enforces originality, and lays out a newsroom structure that guides the model from raw link to publishable story. For AI news bloggers, it’s an efficient way to scale consistent, trustworthy coverage—fast—without sacrificing voice, clarity, or integrity.